Skip to content

Ghana news briefing

The Law 101: Burden of Proof, Defective Charges, and Constitutional Safeguards -Sedina Christine Tamakloe Attionu v. The Republic (Suit No: H2/17/2026)

By GhanaSummary Newsroom1 min read
The Law 101: Burden of Proof, Defective Charges, and Constitutional Safeguards -Sedina Christine Tamakloe Attionu v. The Republic (Suit No: H2/17/2026)

The court went further: unless a statute plainly imposes a burden on the accused, she is under no obligation to supply evidence to shore up a prosecution case that has not reached the threshold of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

The Court of Appeal emphasised that a negative allegation does not relieve the prosecution of its duty to prove every element of an offence, nor can an accused person's silence in a trial in absentia be used to plug fatal gaps in the State's case.

The court’s conclusion The Court reaffirmed the most fundamental principle of criminal justice: the burden of proof rests squarely on the prosecution and never shifts to the accused unless a statute expressly says so.

ShareXFacebookWhatsApp

This is a summary of the original articles listed below. Always read the source articles for the full context. GhanaSummary does not create or modify the news — we summarise and link to original publishers.

Original sources

1 reports

More stories

View all news