University of Ghana law lecturer, Prof Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, says the process leading to the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo strictly adhered to constitutional provisions.
Speaking on JoyNews' Pulse, Prof Appiagyei-Atua said it will be difficult to point out legal lapses that might have influenced President John Mahama's September 1 move. "From the constitutional angle, due process was followed," he stated, adding that the outcome was expected. "It was a foregone conclusion looking at the way proceedings went." Prof.
Appiagyei-Atua noted that while the political implications of the decision are open to interpretation, constitutionally, the President acted within the law after receiving the Article 146 Committee's recommendation.
He further defended Justice Torkornoo's approach during the inquiry, describing her confrontational posture as a legitimate fight for her rights. "She had to fight for her rights," he stressed, adding that her decision to challenge aspects of the process at the Human Rights Court was also justified.
