A Justice of the Supreme Court, Justice Yonni Kulendi, has said that the Apex Court "cannot by 'peer pressure' be cajoled into adopting" the practices of homosexuality from other countries. According to him, the Constitution of Ghana is "supreme and not subservient to the constitutions and laws of other nations and jurisdictions." Justice Yonni Kulendi made this known in his concurring opinion of a seven-member panel of the Supreme Court, which unanimously dismissed a writ filed by a law lecturer on the constitutionality or otherwise of the constitutional provisions that criminalized homosexuality. The Apex Court on July 24, 2024, affirmed that provisions in the Constitution that incriminate homosexuality or unnatural carnal knowledge (anal sex) are lawful. The panel of seven, chaired by Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, declared that "Section 104(1)(D) of Act 29 is not discriminatory against homosexuals; neither does it infringe on the privacy of individuals, be they homosexuals or practitioners of other forms of sexual orientation which involve unnatural carnal knowledge however described." The panel, which also includes Justice Avril Lovelace-Johnson, Justice Omoro Amadu Tanko, Justice Ernest Gaewu, Justice Yaw Darko Asare, and Justice Agyei-Frimpong, said that "the criminalization of acts of unnatural carnal knowledge, under Section 104(1)(b) of the Criminal and Other Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29), is in our view, not inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the 1992 Constitution." "It is, therefore, not unconstitutional," the panel said, and on that premise, dismissed the Plaintiff's action in its entirety. The Plaintiff, Dr.