--}}
3News

Supreme Court to give reason for ordering Parliament to remove Quayson's name on June 7

Supreme Court to give reason for ordering Parliament to remove Quayson's name on June 7

The Minority Leader Dr Cassiel Ato Forson has revealed that information he has received indicates that the Supreme Court will give the reason for ordering Parliament to remove the name of Assin North Member of Parliament James Gyakye Quayson from the records of Parliament on 7th June 2023.

He revealed this during the vetting of the Chief Justice Nominee Gertrude Torkornoo by the Appointments Committee of Parliament on Friday, May 26.

The absence of the reason for the apex court’s order became an issue of controversy during the vetting of the nominee.

For instance, Bawku Central Lawmaker Mahama Ayariga told her that the Minority side on the Appointments Committee of Parliament had a challenge in partaking in her vetting because she was part of the seven-member Justices of the Supreme Court that ordered Parliament to remove the name of Assin North Member of Parliament James Gyakye Quayson from the records without giving reasoning.

Mahama Ayariga said they had a challenge with the apex court’s refusal to give the reasoning for the orders.

Mr Ayariga said “The Minority had a reservation because you participated in the decision involving James Quayson.

You did not give a reason for your judgment so as we speak we don’t know the basis on which the court arrived at that conclusion.

“There is uncertainty among us as MPs knowing that our Supreme Court is Consticionl Court that should guide us as a country as to how to run public affairs.

[But] we have reached a negotiated position with our colleagues.

when we finish today when the SC gives the reason we will have another opportunity to now assess on the basis of the quality of the reasoning of the court and then we can take the debate.”

Prior to Mr Ayariga’s comment, Dr Ato Forosn said that they were waiting for the written judgment of the apex court on the Assin North Lammaker.

Dr Forsion said the Minority wanted to screen her, especially on that order given to Parliament but first needed to have copies of the judgment.

“We will be focusing on her judgment on her running from the time she went to the Supreme court,” the Ajumako Enyan Essiam lawmaker said during the Appointments Committee sitting on Friday to screen the nominee.

But answering them, Madam Torkornor said “The Supreme Court is not a court unless there are five or seven people.

“My answer is that I have given hundreds of judgments from High Court till now, it would be a great relief if I am assessed on my work as a whole, not the judgments of the Supreme Court.”

She added “Seven people are working together that is why very often, almost invariably every judgment that is given the reasons come out long after the orders.”

 

 

Original Story on: 3News
Scroll to Top